|
|
| |
SRF's Token "Amendments" Not Enough Brett Narloch Monday, 7 July 2008
On June 20th, the North Dakota Policy Council (NDPC) outlined the reasons why Burleigh County should demand the nearly $1000,000 back it is paying SRF Consulting to update the Burleigh County Comprehensive Plan. Those reasons were:
- Effective comprehensive planning is impossible.
- SRF skipped crucial steps that make up the rational planning model.
- SRF is promoting a fad called "smart growth," instead of making the plan specific to Burleigh County.
- The Draft Plan is little more than regurgitated plans SRF has completed in the past for other counties.
- SRF completely ignored public input that they were paid to collect and use.
Is SRF Consulting Fulfilling its Contractual Duties? Brett Narloch Thursday, 26 June 2008
In June 2007, Burleigh County hired SRF Consulting (SRF) to update the Burleigh County Comprehensive Plan. The contract would pay SRF almost $100,000. Planners, such as those at SRF, use a “rational planning model” to write long-range plans. Rational planning identifies problems, establishes criteria to evaluate alternatives, creates alternatives, and chooses one. GOOD INTENTIONS ARE NOT ENOUGH Brent Bartsch Monday, 9 June 2008
There are few economic principles that are fully grasped by the average person. After all, economics is a science that often leads to counterintuitive observations and so it is unsurprising that economic principles are generally not correctly applied. It also happens to be unnecessary for most people to understand much of economics in order to economize successfully and do well for themselves in their day-to-day lives. However, understanding economics becomes significantly more necessary once a community is asked to vote on public policy proposals. Burleigh County Comprehensive Plan is anything but Rational or Comprehensive Thursday, 15 May 2008 SRF, the private consulting firm hired to update the Burleigh County comprehensive land-use plan, says its goal is to “reduce sprawl.” But why, in a state that is 99 percent rural, has sprawl become such an overriding problem?
The planners say it costs more to provide infrastructure and services to far-flung developments. Yet they admit they have no evidence this is true in Burleigh County. UPS, FedEx, electricity, and telephone companies manage to cover their costs serving low-density developments. Burleigh County should also be able to do so.
The planning profession uses a “rational planning model” to address issues like this one. Rational planners identify goals, develop alternative ways of achieving those goals, and estimate the benefits and costs of each alternative. Only then do they put together a plan that attempts to achieve the greatest benefits at the least cost. Green Influence: the Conspiracy that is the Green Grand Forks Committee Thursday, 07 February 2008
Contrary to what the Green Grand Forks committee would have citizens believe, it is working hard to ensure that land use restrictions become tighter and tighter in Grand Forks and the surrounding area. The committee and planners are trained in "sustainable development" and "smart growth." The Cost of Grand Forks Going Green Tuesday, 13 November 2007
On Thursday, November 8, the Green Grand Forks committee met for the first time. According to the Grand Forks Herald, the committee met with Mayor Mike Brown's approval. The committee task is to "chart the way" towards a "greener" Grand Forks. City Governments vs. Rural Private Property Rights Tuesday, 06 November 2007
In early September, the North Dakota Policy Council released a report detailing the dangerous agenda that "professional" city planners are promoting entitled "smart growt," a global land grab scheme aimed at increasing land regulations and decreasing the number of privately held acres of land. Clean Water Restoration Act (Handout) Monday, 05 November 2007
To download the handout, click HERE. Daniel Boone Thrown into Our World Tuesday, 30 October 2007
October marks the 273rd anniversary of the birth of Daniel Boone. Remember him? He's the guy who headed out West and settled in Kentucky. He became one of America's first folk heroes. His world is very much different than today's... Beware of Schemes Promoting Economic Development Monday, 08 October 2007
The United State is the richest country on Earth for one reason: capitalism. Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman said that "history suggests only that capitalism is a necessary condition for political freedom." In other words, for a people to be free and for a people to be able to choose its representatives, those people must have economic freedom. Bismarck MPO Promotes Socialist Agenda Monday, 08 October 2007
The Bismarck Metropolitan Organization (MPO) is a Bismarck Municipal Division whose purpose is transportation planning for the Bismarck/Mandan area. MPOs are designated in metropolitan areas with a population of at least 50,000 people. To receive federal funding, the MPOs must adhere to federal guidelings. MPOs are directed by members of the American Planning Association (APA). The Bismarck MPO is no different than other MPOs in that they are subject to federal guidelines (they received $560,300 in federal funding) and are directed by an APA member, Steve Saunders. More Social Engineering Thursday, 27 September 2007
Earlier this week, the NDPC alerted the public as to what Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) wants to do to get you out of your own house. Now, it turns out that Rep. Dingell wants to make energy MORE expensive. Ducks Unlimited's Curious Ties: Radical Environmentalism Thursday, 27 September 2007
Ducks Unlimited (DU) "conserves, restores and manages wetlands and associated habitats for North America's waterfowl." It was created by sportsmen during the Dust Bowl era (1937) because they feared that waterfowl was disappearing too rapidly. DU has been around for awhile and they have the membership and funding to go with it. As of January 1, 2007, DU has a membership of 774,022 and a budget of $160.2 million. Brett Narloch: Public-private partnerships have downside everywhere Wednesday, 26 September 2007
On Sunday September 23, Fargo Forum editor Mathew Von Pinnon wrote a column in the paper entitled Public-private partnerships have downside on campuses. Here is a quote from that letter: The two universities’ alumni foundations will pay for the new homes, and as usual, supplement the presidents’ public salaries of $290,000 to $325,000. To what level alumni will supplement the salaries, we don’t know.
Government & Economic Development: Economic Developement Trumps Public Safety? Tuesday, 14 August 2007
WIth the unfortunate collapse of the Interstate 35 bridge in the Twin Cities, the debate about infrastructure has been renewed. What happened in Minnesota could also happen to one of the bridges in North Dakota. The danger to North Dakota's bridges is not only on the major overpasses in Fargo or the bridges that span the Missouri River, but in the small bridges taht have to withstand farm machinery, as well. The fact is that every bridge in North Dakota is a bridge worth maintaining. Sunshine on Schools Tuesday, 14 August 2007
The North Dakota Policy Council has released Sunshine on Schools, a plan that would require all school districts to put all of their budgeting information on a searchable website. Because understanding how schools are spending money is essential to understanding how much money they actually need, more people need to gain that understanding. Dakota Resource Council: A Fringe Environmental Group Tuesday, 14 August 2007
The Chairman of the North Dakota Farm Bureau Political Action Committee, Eric Aasmundstad, has called the Dakota Resource Council (DRC) a "fringe environmental group." A closer look at how the DRC is organized and where it receives its money reveals that Aasmundstad was spot on. Government's Involvement in Economic Development may put North Dakotans at Risk Friday, 03 August 2007
With the tragedy in the Twin Cities unfolding over the last couple days, North Dakotans have been digging into their own government's activities regarding basic infrastructure and public safety. A close look at North Dakota's recent past suggests that some in power have been using transportation funds for pork projects under the supposed guise of "economic development." The Declaration of Independence vs. the UN Charter Thursday, 05 July 2007
The Declaration of Independence states that all Americans have “certain unalienable Rights.” Among those Rights are “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Those Rights were bestowed upon the people by their “Creator.” In other words, there is no government that can take those Rights away; there is no government that can restrict those Rights; and, there is no government that can be legitimate without the “consent of the governed.” Another Ally in the Fight for Property Rights Tuesday, 26 June 2007
There is a new North Dakota-based organization that is helping the fight against government takeover of private property, the North Dakota Policy Council (NDPC). The NDPC is a non-profit educational corporation dedicated to free-markets and private property. House Energy Bill and the Wildlands Project Friday, 22 June 2007
The House version of the Energy Bill contains some pretty interesting sections pertaining to landowners. Government should Stay Out of Economic Development Thursday, 10 May 2007
Imation, an Oakdale, MN manufacturer of floppy disks, has recently announced that they are closing their plant in Wahpeton leaving over 350 people without jobs. Immediately, talking heads Ed Schultz and Vern Thompson on their show News and Views railed against Imation for their decision to close the plant. One issue that has particularly irked Schultz and Thompson is the fact that Imation has received $10.5 million in grants, tax breaks, and other incentives from city, state, and federal sources, and now they are taking that money and leaving. This begs a larger question: why did Imation get the money in the first place? Government & Ethanol: Cutting Taxes vs. Corporate Welfare Thursday, 22 March 2007
The State of North Dakota has chosen ethanol and biodiesel as a cure all for creating economic growth and ending rural stagnation. Large-agribusiness and professional politicians at the national level have successfully convinced the people that the subsidization of ethanol and biodiesel is good for rural economies, national security, and global warming. Those noble goals often blind ethanol and biodiesel supporters to the adverse side affects that government’s interference will inevitably create.
|
|
|